Fact-check frenzy: Outlets prepare for Trump's return to the debate stage

Sept. 8, 2024, 2:54 a.m.

Read time estimation: 5 minutes.

  2

Donald Trump’s return to the debate stage has media organizations grappling once more with how to cover his frequent distortions of the truth.

Several fact-checking operations say they have been preparing for weeks ahead of the Republican’s face-off Tuesday against Vice President Kamala Harris, their only debate currently scheduled before the November 5 election.

Democrat Harris will also face scrutiny over how she presents her and President Joe Biden’s White House record, as well as her own policy agenda.

CNN faced criticism for refraining from issuing real-time corrections when Trump made a series of false claims during his June debate against Biden, whose lackluster performance ultimately resulted in his withdrawal from the race.

Advertisement According to the network’s in-house fact-checker, Trump made over 30 such statements, including the baseless claim that Democrat-led states allow babies to be executed after birth.

Outlets including AFP and the New York Times, meanwhile, devoted outsized resources toward fact-checking the debate – and plan to do so again next week.

The Times focused 29 reporters on fact-checking the June clash – several more than it pulled together for Trump’s first debate in 2016 against Hillary Clinton.

The US fact-checking website PolitiFact also assembled 27 journalists to cover the event, which editor-in-chief Katie Sanders described as its “biggest team ever.”

“We see our highest traffic on debate night, so we go all in with staffing,” Sanders told AFP, adding: “For some voters, this is their only chance to receive fact-checking.”

The nonprofit has been hurrying to screen Harris’s go-to attack lines ever since she entered the race in July, and is also examining which falsehoods Trump is most likely to repeat.

“What looks like live fact-checking on a debate night is actually drawing from days and weeks and months of consistent fact-checking of the candidates,” Sanders said.

Perhaps the most significant challenge is that Trump consistently creates new false or misleading claims in addition to repeating well-worn falsehoods, like his unfounded assertion of substantial fraud in the 2020 election.

“There has never been a presidential candidate like Trump, who has deliberately used lying as a campaign strategy,” Alan Schroeder, professor emeritus at Northeastern University, told AFP.

Advertisement The Washington Post documented 30,573 false or misleading statements made by Trump during his time in the White House.

‘An impossible position’ Schroeder, who authored a book on presidential debates, said misstatements on the debate stage used to generate mountains of humiliating news coverage.

A gaffe about the Soviet Union’s presence in Eastern Europe became a defining moment of Gerald Ford’s 1976 election defeat, for example.

But Trump’s repeated lies have shifted the goalposts.

“In debates, this means dumping so many falsehoods into the dialogue that it becomes impossible to provide real-time corrections or context,” Schroeder said.

Trying to insert fact-checks into the conversation without appearing biased puts moderators “in an impossible position,” he told AFP.

Advertisement “Any amount of time spent refuting or clarifying erroneous claims during a debate is time not spent discussing more substantive matters.”

Dartmouth College’s Brendan Nyhan, who studies political misperceptions, said live fact-checking requires difficult judgments about what to correct and what to let go.

“Live fact-checking is a high-wire act,” he told AFP.

ABC News, which is hosting Tuesday’s debate, did not respond to requests for comment on whether its moderators will challenge Trump and Harris to back up their claims.

During the June debate, ABC included fact-checks from PolitiFact on its liveblog.

New York Times fact-checker Linda Qiu conceded that whenever candidates square off, fact-checkers are “always going to be minutes behind the action.”

Advertisement Her team also invests weeks gathering research and scrutinizing candidate statements to be ready for their liveblog, she shared with AFP.

Yet specialists and fact-checkers concur that it's beneficial to provide a record of what is and isn't precise, even with the time lag.

“It’s our public service as journalists to inform the public of the truth behind the rhetoric,” Glenn Kessler, the Washington Post’s lead fact-checker, told AFP.

Still, a sad reality pervades: “Every presidential candidate lies,” Kessler said.